<script async src=”//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js”></script>
<!– Front page sidebar –>
<ins class=”adsbygoogle”
style=”display:inline-block;width:300px;height:600px”
data-ad-client=”ca-pub-6727059054102892″
data-ad-slot=”4003498234″></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script>



Screech! Another ART Roadblock

Screech! Another ART Roadblock

At its last meeting, the Council declined to give ART opponents a hearing on the the Landmarks Commission's refusal to explain why it has twice deferred a ruling on a challenge to the design of the ART project

 City Landmarks Commission’s Failure to Act Backfires

Judge: Opponents Got a Raw Deal

Another Setback for Mayor’s Fast-track OK for Disputed Project

BY DENNIS DOMRZALSKI

Mayor Richard Berry’s Albuquerque Rapid Transit project ran into a legal pothole when a state court judge ordered the City Council to – catch this – do its job and give ART opponents a hearing on a procedural, but also substantive, matter regarding the project.

In what is a relatively rare legal procedure, Bernalillo County District Judge Victor Lopez issued a Writ of Mandamus to the Council ordering it to obey a city law that requires it to give ART opponents a hearing on the refusal of the city’s Landmarks and Urban Conservation Commission to explain why it has refused to explain its decision – or non-decision – in favor or ART.

That body has has twice deferred making a decision on a challenge to ART’s design.

Under city law, the Landmarks Commission is required to issue findings of fact, or explain why it has deferred a matter. And if the Commission declines to issue those findings of fact, the Council is required to hold a public hearing on the matter.

But at its last meeting, the Council declined to give ART opponents a hearing on the the Landmarks Commission’s refusal to explain why it has twice deferred a ruling on a challenge to the design of the ART project in about a mile-long stretch in the East Downtown area.

Instead of giving opponents a hearing, the Council sent the matter back to the Landmarks Commission, which delays the process.

But Lopez said that was improper, and the judge ordered the Council to provide the required hearing on Aug. 1.

In his ruling, Lopez “commanded” the Council to “forthwith … comply with your mandatory, non-discretionary duty established by Albuquerque Code of Ordinance … to schedule an appropriate amount of time on the agenda of the August 1, 2016 meeting to hear” the appeal of the Landmarks Commission’s refusal to explain why it has deferred a decision on the challenge to ART’s design.

Lopez also ordered the Landmarks Commission, which is scheduled to meet Wednesday, July 13, to take no action on the ART matter until the City Council holds its hearing next month.

Attorney Yolanda Gallegos, who filed the suit against the Council last week, said the legislative body refused to follow its own rules even after being given ample warning that a lawsuit was coming.

“It’s a shame that they did not follow the rules when they had every opportunity to do so,” Gallegos said. “They had every opportunity to follow the rules, but they wouldn’t do it.”

The case began in March when the city asked the Landmarks Commission to give it a “certificate of appropriateness” for the design of about a mile-long section of ART in the East Downtown area. ART opponents objected to the city’s request, and at its April meeting, the Landmarks Commission deferred the matter. Under city law, the Commission was required to explain the reasons for the deferral, but gave none, Gallegos said. But no one challenged that deferral, she added.

At its May meeting, the Landmarks Commission again deferred making a decision on the city’s application, and it again refused to explain why. That time, Central Avenue property owner and ART opponent Doug Peterson was in attendance and asked for an explanation for the deferral. When the Commission declined to give one, Peterson appealed to the City Council for a public hearing as is provided by in city ordinance. But instead of holding a public hearing, the Council simply remanded the matter back to the Landmarks Commission.

After that, Gallegos went to court on Peterson’s behalf and asked for the Writ of Mandamus, or an order that the Council do the job it was required to do by law.

Lopez also ordered the city to pay the costs associated with the lawsuit.

“So far, we’re just not seeing that the city understands just how precious and treasured Central Avenue is to the citizens of Albuquerque,” Gallegos said. “They just don’t get it.”

 

 

 

The following two tabs change content below.
Dennis Domrzalski is managing editor of ABQ Free Press. Reach him at dennis@freeabq.com.
3 comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

3 Comments

  • pete
    July 13, 2016, 9:10 am

    This is what you call "thinking out of the box" practicing law. The City Council has three options: 1. ignore the order forcing the District Court’s hand to consider sanctions, 2. appeal the order on the grounds that the State Court lack ed jurisdiction to issue the order because the case is now in in federal court, or #. set aside a few hours and merely go through the motions of pretending they will listen and then just go ahead and do what they want to and send it back to the Landmarks Commission with instructions to issue findings. The real test will be the July 27 and 28 hearing in Federal Court which may render everything moot for having a council meeting in August..

    REPLY
  • Barbara Grothus
    July 13, 2016, 9:22 am

    At the last Council meeting I attended, there were at least 2 new appointments to the Landmarks Commission, which like most of the City’s commissions, have had numerous vacancies during the Mayor’s terms and which have languished due to lack of appointments all this time. Gosh, I wonder why there was such urgency to fill those slots? That would be worth looking into, Dennis.

    REPLY
  • Manuel
    July 13, 2016, 1:22 pm

    Comment *

    REPLY
The following two tabs change content below.
Albuquerque’s definitive alternative newspaper publishing an inquisitive, modern approach to the news and entertainment stories that matter most to New Mexicans. ABQ Free Press’ fresh voice speaks to insightful and involved professionals who care deeply about our community.