<script async src=”//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js”></script>
<!– Front page sidebar –>
<ins class=”adsbygoogle”
style=”display:inline-block;width:300px;height:600px”
data-ad-client=”ca-pub-6727059054102892″
data-ad-slot=”4003498234″></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script>



APD Stonewalling Alleged

APD Stonewalling Alleged

The head of the civilian oversight board wrote that APD’s actions 'directly thwart' efforts at civilian oversight and use-of-force reform at department

Scathing Letter Filed with Federal Court

Chief Eden and APD Frustate Civilian Board ‘At Every Turn’

UPDATED WITH MAYOR’S OFFICE COMMENT

BY DAN VUKELICH

Albuquerque’s Police Oversight Board has told the office of the U.S. Attorney for New Mexico that the Albuquerque Police Department has stonewalled the agency “at every turn” in its attempt to help reform the troubled department.

In a letter to Elizabeth Martinez of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Beth Mohr, chair of the oversight agency, laid out scathing criticisms of APD Chief Gorden Eden. She wrote that APD’s actions “directly thwart” efforts at civilian oversight and use-of-force reform.

The civilian board’s efforts have become a “waste of time” because of APD’s refusal to cooperate as required by city ordinance and the settlement agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice’s lawsuit over APD’s unconstitutional use of force, she wrote. ABQ Free Press Weekly contacted an APD spokesperson seeking comment who did not immediately reply. Rhiannon Samuel, a spokesperson for Mayor Richard Berry said in an email, ‘It is not my understanding that APD is ‘stonewalling’ the board.”

In her letter, Mohr lays out four main areas of unresponsiveness by APD.

In a section entitled, “The Chief has failed to respond to the POB regarding findings and disciplinary recommendation,” Mohr wrote:

“The City Ordinance which created the POB mandates that the Chief respond to the POB in writing any time he fails to concur with our findings and/or disciplinary recommendation. As of this date, I am unaware that the Chief has ever responded to the POB regarding any of our findings or disciplinary recommendations. This was reported in the popular press and the Chief has failed to comply with the Ordinance.”

Mohr continued that Eden’s pattern of resisting and ignoring the POB has led to no consequences for Eden or anyone else in the command structure at APD. Most of the people in charge of APD now were in place in the years during which the department was found by the U.S. Department of Justice to have engaged in a pattern and practice of unconstitutional policing and excessive use of force.

In a section entitled “The APD provided the [the POB’s investigatory arm] only a redacted version of the Monitor’s report,” Mohr alleges that APD is “attempting to interfere with the [board’s] ability to meet our own requirements” under the DOJ settlement. An independent monitor, James Ginger, was appointed by a federal judge to oversee reform at APD. The monitor issues periodic reports on APD’s progress or lack thereof. His reports have been highly critical of APD.

The POB was created as part of the city’s reform plan under the DOJ settlement agreement. The only possible reason for redaction of portions of the DOJ monitor’s report, Mohr wrote, “would be to interfere” with the board’s work. She also alleges that APD “counts it in their best interest to hide material matters in the report from us.” Under city ordinance, the board was created to participate in APD policymaking, while the Civilian Police Oversight Agency investigates allegations of police misconduct and reports its findings to the board for possible action.

In a section of her letter entitled “The APD is withholding data from the [board and its investigatory agency] which is necessary for us to perform our policy recommendation functions,” Mohr wrote that APD has denied the board’s requests for information involving officer-involved crashes and drug testing of police officers in crashes.

“These continued failures on APD’s part to provide data as requested have, as of this moment, resulted in no consequences which would dissuade this continued behavior,” she wrote.

In a section entitled, “APD continues to exclude, ignore and directly thwart the POB’s attempt to contribute to APD policy,” Mohr wrote that APD has refused or obstructed the board’s attempt to contribute to APD policymaking. She alleged that APD’s failure to cooperate and help set a policy has contributed to the board’s failed attempt to “look into thousands of unprocessed rape kits.”

She alleges that Eden is in violation of the DOJ settlement agreement, yet suffers no consequences for his refusal to allow board involvement in policy-making.

“It appears that APD’s goal is to frustrate civilian oversight and input at every turn,” she wrote.

Dan Vukelich is editor of ABQ Free Press Weekly. Reach him at editor@freeabq.com

The following two tabs change content below.
Dan Vukelich is a writer and former editor of ABQ Free Press.

Latest posts by Dan Vukelich (see all)

1 comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

1 Comment

  • Anonymous
    November 5, 2016, 8:17 am

    " – Rhiannon Samuel, a spokesperson for Mayor Richard Berry said in an email, ‘It is not my understanding that APD is ‘stonewalling’ the board.” – "

    This is hilarious when you consider no one from the Mayor’s office has ever showed up, even though they have been invited month after month, to speak at a Police Oversight Board meeting.

    Rhiannon Samuel may as well be giving her opinion on how to preform brain surgery.

    REPLY
The following two tabs change content below.
Dennis Domrzalski is managing editor of ABQ Free Press. Reach him at dennis@freeabq.com.

Latest posts by Dennis Domrzalski (see all)